Araştırma Makalesi
Yıl 2013,
Cilt: 4 Sayı: 12, 7 - 16, 01.07.2013
Öz
The growing concern for education and innovative technologies has led to a new dimension of learning. The paper proposes a new framework NormATel using the concept of Normative Multi-Agent system, Activity Theory and e-Learning. The basic idea of the paper is to make e-learning more user specific using the concept of Web 3.0, like its ability to work on two separate modes: single user learning and community based learning. The proposed framework is verified using Deontic Logic.
Anahtar Kelimeler
Kaynakça
- Keegan, D.(1996), “Foundations of Distance Education”, 3rd edn, London: Routledge Press.
- Bricken, W. (1990). Learning in virtual reality. Seattle, WA: Human Interface Technology Laboratory Technical Report HITL‐M‐90‐5.
- Karlsey,G. & Shneiderman, B. (1998). Engagement theory: A framework for technology‐based teaching and learning. Educational Technology, 38(5), 20‐23.
- Hayes, Gary.(2006) ʺVirtual Worlds, Web 3.0 and Portable Profiles.ʺ Personalize Media .
- Vygotsky. L (1978), “Mind and Society”, Cambridge MA, Harvard University Press.
- Engeström, Yrjö.(2001) ʺExpansive learning at work: Toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization.ʺ Journal of education and work 14.1: 133‐156.
- Mwanza, Daisy, and Yrjö Engeström (2005), ʺManaging content in E‐learning environments.ʺ British Journal of Educational Technology 36.3, pp. 453‐463.
- Savarimuthu, Bastin Tony Roy, and Stephen Cranefield (2011) ʺNorm creation, spreading and emergence: A survey of simulation models of norms in multi‐agent systems.ʺ Multiagent and Grid Systems 7.1: 21‐54.
- Chrisholm, Roderick.M(1963), “Contrary to Duty Impeartives and Deontic Logic”, Analysis,33‐36
- Brewka, Grchard (1989), “Non‐Monotonic Logics: A Brief Overview”, AI Communications: The European Journal of Artificial Intelligence, 88‐97.
- Brown Mark A (1996), “Deontic Logic, Agency, and Normative Systems”, New York, Springer Verlag.
- Guido Boella, Gabriella, Pigozzi and Leenderf, Toore, (2009) “NormativeFramework System Change”, Proceedings of 8th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi Agent System”.
- Jan Aasman, “Activity Recognition using a Web 3.0 Database”, IEEE Computer Society, pp. 90‐93.
- Mathew J.Hoffman (2000),” Exploring Norm Emergence and Evolution: An Investigation with Agent Based Models”, Annual Meeting of the Political Science Association, Washington DC, Poster Session.
- Namrata Dhanda, Manuj Darbari, Neelu J Ahuja (2012) “Development of Multi Agent Activity Theory (MATeL) Framework Focussing on Indian Scenario”, International Review on Computers and Software, Vol 7, No.4, pp. 1624‐1628.
- Xion Hui‐Xang, Su Ying,(2010) “Study of Optimization of Personalised e‐Learning system based on Web 3.0M”, 2nd IEEE International Conferenceon Future Computer Communication, Vol 2, May.
Yıl 2013,
Cilt: 4 Sayı: 12, 7 - 16, 01.07.2013
Öz
The growing concern for education and innovative technologies has led to a new dimension of learning. The paper proposes a new framework NormATel using the concept of Normative Multi-Agent system, Activity Theory and e-Learning. The basic idea of the paper is to make e-learning more user specific using the concept of Web 3.0, like its ability to work on two separate modes: single user learning and community based learning. The proposed framework is verified using Deontic Logic.
Anahtar Kelimeler
Kaynakça
- Keegan, D.(1996), “Foundations of Distance Education”, 3rd edn, London: Routledge Press.
- Bricken, W. (1990). Learning in virtual reality. Seattle, WA: Human Interface Technology Laboratory Technical Report HITL‐M‐90‐5.
- Karlsey,G. & Shneiderman, B. (1998). Engagement theory: A framework for technology‐based teaching and learning. Educational Technology, 38(5), 20‐23.
- Hayes, Gary.(2006) ʺVirtual Worlds, Web 3.0 and Portable Profiles.ʺ Personalize Media .
- Vygotsky. L (1978), “Mind and Society”, Cambridge MA, Harvard University Press.
- Engeström, Yrjö.(2001) ʺExpansive learning at work: Toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization.ʺ Journal of education and work 14.1: 133‐156.
- Mwanza, Daisy, and Yrjö Engeström (2005), ʺManaging content in E‐learning environments.ʺ British Journal of Educational Technology 36.3, pp. 453‐463.
- Savarimuthu, Bastin Tony Roy, and Stephen Cranefield (2011) ʺNorm creation, spreading and emergence: A survey of simulation models of norms in multi‐agent systems.ʺ Multiagent and Grid Systems 7.1: 21‐54.
- Chrisholm, Roderick.M(1963), “Contrary to Duty Impeartives and Deontic Logic”, Analysis,33‐36
- Brewka, Grchard (1989), “Non‐Monotonic Logics: A Brief Overview”, AI Communications: The European Journal of Artificial Intelligence, 88‐97.
- Brown Mark A (1996), “Deontic Logic, Agency, and Normative Systems”, New York, Springer Verlag.
- Guido Boella, Gabriella, Pigozzi and Leenderf, Toore, (2009) “NormativeFramework System Change”, Proceedings of 8th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi Agent System”.
- Jan Aasman, “Activity Recognition using a Web 3.0 Database”, IEEE Computer Society, pp. 90‐93.
- Mathew J.Hoffman (2000),” Exploring Norm Emergence and Evolution: An Investigation with Agent Based Models”, Annual Meeting of the Political Science Association, Washington DC, Poster Session.
- Namrata Dhanda, Manuj Darbari, Neelu J Ahuja (2012) “Development of Multi Agent Activity Theory (MATeL) Framework Focussing on Indian Scenario”, International Review on Computers and Software, Vol 7, No.4, pp. 1624‐1628.
- Xion Hui‐Xang, Su Ying,(2010) “Study of Optimization of Personalised e‐Learning system based on Web 3.0M”, 2nd IEEE International Conferenceon Future Computer Communication, Vol 2, May.
Toplam 16 adet kaynakça vardır.
Ayrıntılar
| Birincil Dil | İngilizce |
|---|---|
| Bölüm | Research Article |
| Yazarlar | |
| Yayımlanma Tarihi | 1 Temmuz 2013 |
| Gönderilme Tarihi | 1 Temmuz 2013 |
| Yayımlandığı Sayı | Yıl 2013 Cilt: 4 Sayı: 12 |
0216 355 56 19 WhatsApp numarasıyla iletişime geçebilirsiniz.
Bu dergideki makaleler Creative Commons Atıf-AynıLisanslaPaylaş 4.0 Uluslararası Lisansı ile lisanslanmıştır.